all 8 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

painful for brainwashed people to see this

[–]dingoatemytaco 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not sure. He's a brilliant researcher and author, and deserves much more attention, and regardless of the way his approaches have been inappropriately hijacked by libertarians, his works can and should be appreciated at 'face value' for following the money and transactions between powerful people. One key thread in his works has been that 'the conflicts of the Cold War were "not fought to restrain communism" but were organised in order "to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts"'. Everyone can agree that money in politics has been a result of late-stage capitalist strategies which have turned the US into a banana republic. The solution to this is not 'do-nothing' libertarianism - as Sutton would also likely agree - but activisim, to vote into office all new politicians who will show how they are helping the 99%, or lose their seats.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

cold war was phony

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sutton was a spook for the heritage Foudnation. Read Susan Pooles book on who financed Hitler instead. Sutton's conjecture is all over the place.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

kicked out of it for not being a spook

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Read his book, lots of speculation and doesn't touch on the Jewish aspect of the Bolsheviks at all.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

lot of proven facts now about the jewish aspect it's mainly about rockefeller and morgan, now those were rothscild agents, but Sutton didn't have proof of that so didn't say it. If he did then you could be right about it being speculation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like how he doesn't get into the motives behind these various financing moves. He did the research on WHAT happened, and he sticks to that. It's up to other people, if so inclined to infer WHY these things were done.

For example, Rockefeller sending money to Hitler was hardly surprising since Rockefeller wanted to find a way to foster the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, and Hitler was proposing to expel the Jews. Or that "American" (read Jewish American) interests would finance the Bolsheviks. If you read Solzhenitzyn's "200 years together" it becomes readily apparent why it would be in their interests to do so. And so on, and so forth.