you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RetardedFaggot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's not residual Khazarian it's etymologically fallacious. You're just employing an association fallacy based on words that sound similar. "Ashkenazi" comes from the "Ashkenaz" tribe from Holy Scripture not "Khazar".

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Part 1

/u/popper

Hey, retardedfaggot, Ashkenaz could more rightfully be called Japheth. Thus, some Jews could be consisdered Japhethites but they are not semites from Shem. Many in fact were Edomites that were forced to convert. The Kazarian Ashkenazis were indeed converts in 7th c. A.D. They are not people of the Torah as a Christian would understand Torah. They are a people of the Talmud (most Christians don't realize this vital fact).

https://www.amazon.com/Jews-Khazaria-Kevin-Alan-Brook-ebook/dp/B078VH2HN7/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/139751.Two_Tiered_Relexification_in_Yiddish?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=3YAJjIUMYP&rank=7

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2890465-the-ashkenazic-jews?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=5TLkR4H8lb&rank=1

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2330779.The_Non_Jewish_Origins_of_the_Sephardic_Jews?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=3YAJjIUMYP&rank=3

Ashkenazi Jews in a bit of a pickle. Since there own scholars are showing that there language doesn’t even go back to a Semitic origin but Japhetic. Which you know Genesis says are the Gentiles.

Jonas Alexis writes:

"The New Jewish Encyclopedia (1962) by David Bridger and Samuel Wolk reinforces what the old Jewish Encyclopedia (1906) said about the history of the Khazarian people. It states that Hasdai Ibn Shaprut (915-975) was a jew of khazaria;

“Physician, diplomat and patron of Jewish learning in Spain. Hasdai served under two Cordova caliphs, and carried out important diplomatic missions. A famous scholar, he surrounded himself with learned Jews of his day and sponsored important literary works.

“With him, it is said, was inaugurated the Golden Era of Jewish literature in Spain…Hasdai’s name is particularly remembered in connection with his correspondence with Joseph, king of the Khazars, who embraced Judaism.”[1]

It also states that there is a story about “the Khazars and their king Bulan” converting to Judaim in 740.[2] Then we find this. The Khazars are;

“A Mongolian people who embraced Judaism and flourished from the 8th through the 10th centuries on the territory extending between the Don and the Volga rivers, and the shores of the Blacks, Caspian and Azov Seas.

“The story of the existence of such converts to Judaism reached the Jewish statesman Hasdai ibn Shaprut of Cordova in the 10th century."

As a result, Shaprut wrote a letter which was ultimately received by Joseph, king of the Khazars, with the help of Jewish tradesmen from Germany and Hungary.

“In his reply King Joseph gave a detailed account of the history of the kingdom of the Khazars and their conversion to Judaism. Bulan, the pagan ruler of the Khazars, in his desire to embrace the ‘true religion’ had summoned representatives of the Christian, Moslem and Jewish faiths to expound their views on the superiority of their respective religion.

“Bulan thus became convinced of the truth of the Jewish faith, and he, as well as many of his noblemen, embraced Judaism, which later spread widely among the common people of the Khazar kingdom…

“The story of the mass conversion of the Khazars to Judaism was used by Judah Halevi as background for his philosophic work the Kuzari, designed as a defense of the Jewish faith.”

[–]RetardedFaggot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Stories. Show Khazarian residue in Ashkenaz jewish culture. This has only been a theory for the last 100 years based on a singular dubious letter, the "Khazar Correspondance". Fantasical nonsense about a jew, a muslim, and a christian walking into a bar and convincing the king to become jewish. Believe absurdities, so Rome can commit atrocities.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, there's also DNA evidence as well. Doesn't matter though because Israel wasn't promised to a bunch of rabbinites who priase that Judahite Hebrews who killed Christ. There's no blood reoationship, only conversion.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it does help explain things, the jews were a tough people back then, defeated romans for 4 years from 66AD to 70 at least, the jews of today can't do that, I mean they keep israel with technology and USA's help. But they're not the same people genetically. The khazars were weak ruling elites of turkey that got kicked out.