all 6 comments

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

All the other footage has an object ("plane") with a matching trajectory. How did that happen? Was all the other footage shot by agents or confiscated by the FBI, and edited before being released? Was the live footage edited? But then what about the eye witnesses, who all at least talk about some object approaching the tower? Were they all crisis actors, and is the theory about a non-plane object a red herring? Have many real eye witnesses been killed to suppress the no-plane truth? This theory opens up too many questions for me to accept, although the information is, of course, good to consider.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

His style and claims lack credibility. Calling them "Fairy Planes" makes his issue appear to be too much fantasy in his life.

Also gotta love the 'missing' planes being a feature of the lowest quality video of the event.

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

To be fair: it is odd that that video lacks any trace of a plane-resembling object.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Given the live video of planes, and reports by people there, a no-plane event is pretty unlikely.

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My point is that it'd be nice to have an explanation for the footage in the OP. A low resolution doesn't make objects disappear.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dunno. Photoshop, or whatever they use for video? The live and subsequent video evidence for planes is pretty overwhelming.