This can't be true... right?

submitted by newguy from (i.redd.it)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

the eiltes. maybe they are right. far too many humans, just a waste of space.

[–]newguy[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

nah fuck that, what's wrong with you

[–]bobbobbybob 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

i used to care, then i realised how utterly stupid most people are

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So? This stupidity demands genocide, then?

[–]bobbobbybob 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

who knows? I'm not in charge, so it isn't my call. But if the sheep voluntarily accept the sterilising injections, they have consented.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Most people became this way, not through genetics, but manufactured consent on industrial and social levels. Children didn't choose to become autistic through vaccinations, nor did they choose to be deprived of Omega-3 during development. This isn't Darwin in action, these are soft kills propagated through division.

In short, don't hate people for being less intelligent than you. Especially if you refuse to raise them up to your level.

[–]bobbobbybob 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Especially if you refuse to raise them up to your level

i tried very hard to inform

[–]FuckMasks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Call for genocide of the regular folks today, turn around tomorrow to find out you're a worthless normie too, in the eyes of the elites.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I certainly wouldn't call for genocide.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sure, why not. 30K for vasectomies and Tubal ligation, if you have no children. 15K if you have one, 10K if you have two, and 5K if you have three or more. I'm sure the elites will gladly give out all that money to save the future right?

[–]bobbobbybob 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

why bother when a vaccine will sterilize your kids and the sheep will pay for it with their labor

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

The 'elites' are right about the 90-99%. They've just proved it again in front of the whole world.

7,794,798,739

We need to lose around 6 billion of these.

[–]ReeferMadness 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

No, they are right about the low IQ, but they are sterilizing the poor irrespective of intelligence. The wealthy will not sterilize their own low IQ kids. And they will not spare the intelligent poor kids either.

I support eugenics, but this is not the way. We should be using selective pressure based on secured testing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. They've also done their damnedest to make people dumber for generations. This isn't an IQ war, it's a class war.

[–]Intuit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

If we stopped rewarding single-mother families and people who make poor decisions, the problem would correct itself without any eugenics.

[–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That would make a small difference. Single motherhood is not a very indicator of intelligence. Lots of wealthy people are dumb and lots of smart people go through hard times. Who is to say a bastard is dumb just because it's mother tried to ensnare an alfa by deceptively getting pregnant with his child?

The reality is those single mothers would still have kids, even if it technically reduced the single parent household number by keeping the family together.

I can see how there would be some corrective pressure to keep women who have a litter of kids for the welfare money to keep having more, but that is too little and poorly placed.

[–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Smart kids aren't useful if they lead broken lives and never amount to much. That's what single parenthood brings, broken people.

[–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That has nothing to do with the genetic portion of IQ which is what eugenics can improve.

[–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It allows IQ to better determine reproductive success.

[–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's like draining a lake to salvage a sunken ship. There are far better ways to improve genetics.

[–]Intuit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is how good genetics formed, by the natural rewards of reality favoring being smart and resourceful.