you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Eat the rich.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Yeah, like that will keep america fed for like about one hour, then what?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Then, the richest of the poor will become the new rich to be eaten. Repeat, until the genes responsible for the accumulation of private property are eliminated from the gene pool. Then, communism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

then after communism, socialism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Huh? Whose property are you redistributing? All the rich are already consumed.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

permanent revolution

there will be corrupt members trying to sell out socialism, they must be constantly guillotined

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Makes sense. Even with no wealth inequality, there would be wrongthinkers to barbecue.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

unironically yes, people that wrongly support the rich need to be taken out, it will be self defense so it's ok

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't it socialism before communism?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

communism, with 60 of misery for the masses, followed by "western capitalism" which transitioning from communism means the typical oligarchical system of capitalism, which brings more misery to the masses since the wealth is concentrated in only a dozen or so hands.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They want to use eugenics.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

eugenics, and with it the total eradication of what is deemed deplorable. Behind it all though is a knowledge that the planet can only support so many people, and a nation only so many. I wonder how much of Stalin's thinking was on population pressures and resources when he let the masses starve and sent them to gulags?

I knew a russian guy, in his forties, a technician type. He came out here with his wife to start a new life in Oz. I asked him once about the 'system' over there and how it had to better now that it wasn't a total dictatorship. Now he would not even have been born when old stalin died but he got all defense of the dictator? Spoke of him in glowing tones in fact! I put it down to delayed Stockholm Syndrome and never bothered having another conversation with the guy. These broken people from broken countries are welcome if they play by our rules, but I'm not a psychologist, and life is too short to have their shit dribbling into my head all the time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stalinist terror is what happens when one has to rely on communists to govern a country. Are they all retards? Are they all villains? Poor Joseph just couldn't figure it out.

It isn't widely known, but late Stalin was fighting against his own party to introduce more democracy and capitalism. His reforms reduced the persecution of common people, and he persecuted many of his genocidal party members. It makes sense for common Russian people to appreciate his efforts.

Stalin had failed to kill Khrushchev. He was close, once. Khrushchev was under investigation for the Ukrainian genocide. But he was extremely good at playing a retard, and as a communist leader, Stalin couldn't just execute them all. The few reasonable party members Stalin had managed to find, were disappeared quickly after his death.

Modern communists can't decide what to think about him. While Stalin was one of the most efficient communist leaders, he clearly lacked faith.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Then we revise the constitution to prevent corruption from seeping in to our government.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

A piece of paper can't have such power.

The state only follows the constitution when it fears the people.

When the state thinks the people are toothless, it will ignore their rules.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Correct. And impoverished people dependent on the government for the very food they eat are not to be feared. The old french monarchy made the mistake of not feeding the people. The US government won't make the same mistake. It can cancel all forms of payments but SNAP will be the last.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Indeed.

The elites will take away everything but the necessary minimum.

Then, the climate will change, and there will be no food, and no reserve.

Faced with the unavoidability of death, people will stop fearing it, and will do whatever they want.

History will repeat itself, and yet another eternal empire will fall.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm usually down on the french, they don't have much of a track record for bravery yet they think they are God's gift to the world, just like the Greeks, the Italians, the British, and even the Egyptians that are starving in their squalor. I call it the Past Empire Syndrome Trademark [PEST]. These pests think that because they once [long long ago] ruled large swaths of the planet that they are the chosen elite, just like every church on the planet thinks it has God's ear and every other religion is false, or at the very lest, misguided on the finer points of doctrine.

But all that aside, I think the French peasants of the révolution were probably a more staunch breed than the TV addicted weak muscled breeds that now reside in most western nations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjDtnLrt71Y

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"We"? Who is "We". You and your friends? The constitution was drafted by rich men to protect the rich, and any revision will done by women and men like them or by psychopaths who have risen to power in the vacuum of legitimate government. Any revision would take away what's left of your freedoms. You're empire is at an end, and so is the 400 year old western empire. It's all downhill now for you I am afraid to say.

Here in Australia, well that's another story...