you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]spaghetti 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I made a point to say that we don't really know who's in charge down there. Could be Muslims, they are very rich and very powerful. Definitely could be China most likely is China. I'm sure Indians from India have a strong foothold in Australia.

For you to just make a firm decision that it is China and China only, isn't that kind of narrow thinking?

When you're in the middle of a conflict or a war, don't ever rest and think that you know everything that's going on.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

For you to just make a firm decision that it is China and China only, isn't that kind of narrow thinking?

My god, you are even stupider than I imagined. I was mocking your suggestion China could be in charge, did you not get the irony of that self-contradictory statement? There are U.S. nukes in Australia to deter the Chinese, it is inconceivable that China is in charge and wants those nukes there. Australia is USA's bitch, definitely not the Chinese or the Muslims

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Sure, and in what capacity does it make sense that China would WANT USA putting a bunch of nuclear weapons close to where they operate in the south pacific? Answer: it does not make sense, China would not want our nukes closer to them. Therefore China would not make Australia let us put them there. So the fact they did, suggests that we, not China are the masters of what Australia does. If you want to suggest otherwise you would have to make some very unlikely or ridiculous assumptions

    Are you really this dumb or are you just trolling me?