you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

Just always keep and open mind and remember that it's all a show, they are working together for Israel.
Conspiracy on the same level as Aliens running the world.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

Obviously, that's why America has spent the last few decades in the middle East systemically taking out Israel's opponents.... Out of charity? Due to a morbid fascination with sand?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

that helps support his point

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Not sure which point you mean it supports, I was being sarcastic

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

sure you were

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay???

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Bro re-read his comment, he is pointing out how the US is Israel's lapdog.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

nah he missed the point

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How? The guy said the JQ is akin to 'aliens running the world' and the guy pointed out that America objectively does go to wars with all of Israel's enemies. How does this make the JQ seem nonsensical and akin to aliens running the world?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

then supports a zionist president

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

America has spent the last few decades in the middle Eas to secure the last of the world's Oil, that's obvious now isn't it. The jews are just an extension of the US military. They do what the US would be doing anyway, dividing the arabs and weakening them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The world has no shortage of oil, the only limiting factor for the foreseeable future is whether its extraction is profitable. America is also not only self-sufficient when it comes to oil production, courtesy of the Permian and other oil shale basins, but was actually (until production dropped this year due to an OVERABUNDANCE of oil) the world's largest oil exporter.

That said I will don't disagree with you saying the IDF is just an extension of the US military, but I think it would be more accurate to say both are the tools of the same global cabal of oligarchs and banksters.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

only limiting factor for the foreseeable future is whether its extraction is profitable

You say that like it's a small thing. When oil costs $200 a barrel about fuckall of the common man is going to be able to afford anything but totally essential travel. As it goes higher it won't be affordable at all. Unaffordable gas is the same as no gas.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Again, I don't disagree with that in any way, but the American government doesn't give a shit about the common man, and they sure as hell didn't invade the middle east for the good of the average American. Profitable oil ≠ Affordable oil. Like I said, we've never in history had more oil available to us and yet it remains near all time high prices to the average person due to profiteering.

I don't disagree that the rest of us are fucked, my point is that that is not why America is in the middle east.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Our economy doesn't work without cheap oil. I didn't mean to imply it's altruistic.

[–]Hellothereawesome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

no.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok, not quite on the same level :)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yep