The people who pay the grants for the research.

Oh, so grants.gov and the NSF and GrantForward and the various national institutes and state government bodies and research charities, combine up with all the similar bodies in every other country and agree to only fund science that proves climate change. Unless that particular grant has nothing to do with climate science, in which case they just use the normal "non-climate science" funding procedure,which would be the one advertised?

And with all the hundreds of thousands of bodies that offer research grants, no one has yet leaked that climate science grants have a different process?

Makes sense. All you'd have to do is get all the money from big wind, and infiltrate every funding body in every country in the world. But without anyone objecting.

Wait a minute. What about research that doesn't include a grant application? Such as papers being put out by tenured professors or published from work done for doctoral theses? How come they don't reject the basic physics that increasing greenhouse gasses increases the greenhouse effect?

It is all a money game to control science the news media and schools and colleges.

Of course! And to control science the news media and schools and colleges, the most straightforward way would be to attack the climate change departments and only the climate change departments. Why didn't I think of that? Could it be because it's batshit crazy?

They brainwash people into working for them or else they blackmail them or find a way to buy them off.

That's a lot of people to blackmail. Google scholar returns over 65,000 papers for the search term "climate change" for this year alone. That must be about 200,000 authors. How do they get that much blackmail material every year, do you think? There must be a cast of tens of millions of agents collecting it.

You know as you work for the same people, ActuallyBot.

Ah. The paranoid delusional argument. At least that makes some plausible context to the above. (◔_◔)