you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not sure where a lot of these disclaimers come from, but I know some of them come from lawsuits. McDonalds, for example, was forced to pay $640k to an old woman for spilling coffee on herself, largely because it was too hot, and that's why just about every coffee cup tells you it's hot.

That's not how to fix these problems. If you don't know that coffee's hot, the problem is with your judgement, not the company's. It is the company's fault, however, if they serve your coffee at too high a temperature — but the solution isn't to put an vague and obvious label on it, it's to tell them they can't make their coffee that hot.

That was precisely the issue. McDonalds would keep their coffee way hotter than the legal limit so they wouldn't have to change it out as often. The old lady had third degree burns across her legs (her vagina was melted shut) and was only awarded the sum of her medical expenses. Stop cucking for billion dollar multinationals.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stop cucking for billion dollar multinationals.

By actually wanting to fix the issue? Tell me how putting a label on the cup solved the issue, and then tell me that forcing them to make the coffee less hot wouldn't solve the issue.

It seems like you're the shill for big business. You're the one who just wants them to put a label on the cup instead of actually solving the issue. Stop projecting with your right-win, Libertarian garbage.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And if you would've read my post — which you obviously didn't (shill account?) — then you would've realized that I was critical of McDonalds and said that labels DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH.