Resurfaced pictures from a wild party in Saint-Tropez have poked a major hole in the royal’s story amid backlash over his disastrous interview.

submitted by Mnemonic from (news.com.au)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Hmm, I can see your side with some of his 'friends/people' egging him on to do this but him thinking it's a good Idea sounds like a detached royal/noble in my play book: I make a statement and it will be so.

This happened too: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2019/11/17/prince-andrews-pr-adviser-reportedly-quit-over-jeffery-epstein-bbc-interview/#78099220777f

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Sources close to Buckingham Palace."

"BECAUSE ITS ON THE NEEEWS, hey... cause I'll just believe it, I'll just believe, without a doubt in my mind."

Like most sources, should we believe anonymous ones, when the messenger, source or broadcaster can just lie?

[–]Mnemonic[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The British press and the Royals is a real thing on its own, especially the British.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And The source is?

[–]Mnemonic[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It says so right beneath the photos: "Picture: Coleman-Rayner Source:Supplied" Probably some gossip magizine from back then.