you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CaelianPost No Toasties 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I wrote this 3 weeks ago:

I did a quick Google and found this: Indian American Scientist Shiva Ayyadurai joins 2024 US presidential race:

Announcing his campaign bid recently, the 59-year-old Mumbai-born said...

Unless his parents are American, he cannot be president. But then technicalities like that have never stopped Dr. Shiva from making noise.

[–]CrazyjanecreepyjeffReality Monger[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He seems to have a different take on it. It's worth watching his interviews. I'm considering giving him my vote if he makes it on the ballot.

Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution referred to “native born” requirement for being President. However, “native born” was never defined. In fact the Maryland Legislature voted to make Marquis De Lafayette and his family native born US Citizens.

Regardless, the Constitution is not a fixed document. It changes with things called Amendments. The 5th and 14th Amendments combined with many Supreme Court rulings made it explicitly clear that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to discriminate between a Native Born and Naturalized Citizen.

Therefore, it is Unconstitutional to NOT allow DR.SHIVA to run and moreover to become President. This would violate those two Amendments, which abrogated/repealed Article 2 Section 1.

Finally, in 2011, the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (FEC) ruled a Naturalized citizen can run for President and raise monies privately but just could not receive matching funds.

This is clear as day, he can run and be President.

If any of the States challenge him, we will take this all the way to the Supreme Court.

[–]tomatopotato★ Free Assange ★ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

War is usually the #1 issue for me for presidential elections. But after what the shots did to my dad and Covid culture did to my friends, I'm leaning Kennedy this time.

That said, I like Shiva overall. His speech/mannerism might be downright off-putting to some, but he seems to have the biggest, most genuine axe to grind with the establishment (and "Not So Obvious Establishment"). No baby gloves regarding Israel like Kennedy. No pandering to corporate interests like Trump (and then putting on the anti-mandate act now that it's safe to do so). I hope Jimmy and others eventually have him on.