you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CaelianPost No Toasties 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That set of beliefs is based upon the idea that humans can and will behave rationally. Unfortunately, that in itself is based upon facts not in evidence.

Humans behave selfishly. That's how the species evolved, and selfishness works until you run out of resources.

I wrote about the short and bleak future of mankind in my April 2020 Reddit post G'bee G'bee G'bee That's All Folks! The money quote:

Civilizations develop the technology to destroy themselves before developing the wisdom not to do so.

[–]AeoooAe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Gretassandra aka Tintin Thunberg, huh? Rather than cool(ing), this factoid is heating things up.

Yes, it’s fantasy, and no recipe for conducting life, but the implied self-evidence per the Tintin albums that every kid is entitled to pets that they’re inseparable from is a climate disaster by itself, now that our global population quadrupled in the 20th century alone. Adding insult to injury the dog is called Snowy. You want that dog? Snow will become basically as seldom as it’s to the Sahara, and you won’t see much snow- or glacier-covered mountains left anymore, so your rivers will alternate their irregular seasonal expressions between running dry and flooding the shit out of your chemical and other factories, cities, and chemical waste disposal sites. (Okay, the end of the warm Gulf stream will prolly initially cover Europe in snow in Siberian-style winters.) I know this is even less popular than reducing meat consumption and human reproduction, and it will never happen, as people’s elementary mental health and sanity and sheer capacity of discerning sense in life (at least in their own dearest, most sacrosanct and inviolable experience) essentially hinges on devastation of the earth by pet keeping, but to save the planet we should restrict dog and cat proliferation to one per school, zero per family.

Thanks for listintinning.

Do I get a this award now?

[–]CaelianPost No Toasties 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Do I get a "this" award now?

Here you go! 😺

[–]AeoooAe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nice, where I kind of had expected to get a very different type of this 👇 this award, namely highly indignant and aggressive “This guy right here!” pointers from dog world, much like the famous meme from the Invasion of the Body Snatchers where Donald Sutherland points at Veronica Cartwright, but in this case not because a real human in a brave new world of soulless guises for humanity got detected, but because someone got busted who proposes to commit the unspeakable crime against the cutie pies that are canine or feline to get the vast majority of them sterile as the inescapable solution to stop the climate kladderadatsch and save the rainforests.

Stop the climate kladderadatsch by putting the cats back in the bag?

I mean such a proponent is making a theoretical cross of DeSantis and Kamala look good by comparison. Imagine cats having to hide from sterilization camps like they’re Anne Frank or something.

This actually rises to the level of such serious sin, that a ban might be warranted, honoring the principle: Fuck around with the number one fan site of cats and dogs (regardless it’s done on a hide-out site), find out?

I don’t feel safe for direct backlash either. Cats are masters of subtle revenge. Not sure if I’m going to survive that. I’ll have to write a will.

[–]CaelianPost No Toasties 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

My dear father said that you should always be nice to cats, because when you die and meet God you may discover that She is a Cat 😺