you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FreedomUltd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm kinda buying these arguments. I'd like to hear more. What are the arguments against selecting officials randomly?

[–]AeoooAe 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A quick glance at the people who won lotteries is a clear argument against selecting people randomly.

ETA more arguments:

Congratulations: the fate of your country is now in the hands of an administration with an average IQ of 100. Confidence imbuement level one thousand though.

The U.S. saw FDR, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Carter. You think randomly selected people would have left behind anything getting near their legacies? Let’s assume their fortunes would have ended up remote-steered by the same forces, so you’d also assume it would look like roughly same same from history’s perspective. FDR seems a clear counter argument against that assumption.

RFK Jr. or Cornel West wouldn’t have gotten the platforms that they have now. Neither would Bernie have risen to fame.