you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ageingrockstar 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Yes, for science and technology it's generally fine. However for current events and biographies of living people it's frequently highly biased. The problem is that these articles all are published under the same brand and wikipedia leverages its reputation from its much more objective articles to propagandise people on current affairs.

    [–]weavilsatemyface 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Yes, for science and technology it's generally fine.

    Aside from medical issues related to some word beginning with V... vacations? vaudeville? ventriloquists? vulcanologists? I forget the word sorry.

    [–]tomatopotato★ Free Assange ★ 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    <insert Guy Fawkes mask here>