you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The good old whataboutist argument here. BLM didn't incite violence against congresspeople and then proceed to enter the Capitol building with an interest in restraining and killing them, along with their security. And a private company should choose to remove people from their message boards who are actively inciting violence. And there is no substantial censorship, if one considers the constant free press these MAGAtards (and esp. Cheeto in Chief) continue to get. Twittler should take the honorable next move and kill himself, just as Hitler had done. Sadly, neo-libs won't go after Twittler in the manner they went after Mussolini.

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BLM didn't incite violence

against congresspeople

oh NO!!!!!!! that should be a crime! when it effects CONGRESS PEOPLE!!!!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or - let's call them elected public servants. You don't like them? Vote for alternatives. Otherwise, you might be happier in Somalia, where you can try to kill anyone who is in power.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

enter the Capitol building with an interest in restraining and killing them

there is no substantial censorship

You're so full of shit. I hate to block people but for you i might make an exception.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Watch the videos