all 53 comments

[–]EvilNick 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I may not agree with what you say so I have the right to delete it...........

[–]fediverseshill 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I may not agree with what you say so I have the right to I am LITERALLY a mongo and i delete everything i dont agree with...........

[–]trident765 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The first amendment gives Americans the right to express any idea that liberals agree with.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

have you tried not killing cops

and don't say what about BLM

[–]EvilNick 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

what?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You're funny

[–]Fitter_Happier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What does killing cops have to do with free speech?

Jesus, you are either a bot or a one man shill machine. Everywhere I go on here you are there making stupid comments.

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (42 children)

Parler version: I may disagree with what you say, and to prove it I'll get an AR and storm national capitol buildings and try to hog tie and kill your congresspeople and their security, and steal and destroy things. Then I'll come for your state capitol building, and then you.

[–]madcow-5 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No one had an AR15. The only people with guns were the police who fired live ammunition into the unarmed crowd.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Who feeds you such liies, madcow?

[–]madcow-5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can you demonstrate otherwise?

I'd be shocked if someone did and it wasn't headline news on every MSM outlet.

Also, you're not allowed to carry in DC.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can carry if you have a permit, albeit not an easy permit to get, it seems.

[–]EvilNick 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

yeah antifa were real assholes there

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Even the terrorists are saying in the videos that there were no "antifa", and journalists and suspected "antifa" (whcih don't exist as an organized group) were pushed out of the crowd and beaten up in the process. There are videos of this.

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lol no. Nothing you say is true.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Plenty of video evidence.

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

post tits or gtfo

[–]Fitter_Happier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What does internet censorship have to do with the ONE magatard riot (compared to the thousands of BLM/Antifa riots over the summer)?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The good old whataboutist argument here. BLM didn't incite violence against congresspeople and then proceed to enter the Capitol building with an interest in restraining and killing them, along with their security. And a private company should choose to remove people from their message boards who are actively inciting violence. And there is no substantial censorship, if one considers the constant free press these MAGAtards (and esp. Cheeto in Chief) continue to get. Twittler should take the honorable next move and kill himself, just as Hitler had done. Sadly, neo-libs won't go after Twittler in the manner they went after Mussolini.

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BLM didn't incite violence

against congresspeople

oh NO!!!!!!! that should be a crime! when it effects CONGRESS PEOPLE!!!!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or - let's call them elected public servants. You don't like them? Vote for alternatives. Otherwise, you might be happier in Somalia, where you can try to kill anyone who is in power.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

enter the Capitol building with an interest in restraining and killing them

there is no substantial censorship

You're so full of shit. I hate to block people but for you i might make an exception.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Watch the videos

[–]BigFatRetard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know, I can't see anything on Parler since it was shut down by our benevolent masters the megacorps.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This was their MO for months before they were shut down.

Normally one can check here, but I'm not sure now:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200901000000*/parler.com

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AR and storm national capitol

proof bigot

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Leftist version: I may disagree with what you say, so I'll take over your streets and neighborhoods by force:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/liberal-cities-radical-mayhem-11591140986

https://www.nj.com/news/2020/05/these-are-all-the-cities-where-protests-and-riots-have-erupted-over-george-floyds-death.html

https://www.foxnews.com/media/broadcast-networks-barely-mention-antifa-riots

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-biden-inauguration-portland-prote/anti-fascist-protesters-vandalize-buildings-in-portland-and-seattle-idUSKBN29Q0H9

https://mynorthwest.com/2493972/rantz-seattle-council-activists-pretend-antifa-riot-didnt-happen/

I'll Burn, Loot and Murder in various cities throughout America for over six months with the blessing of fellow leftist DAs, mayors or governors....and indulgences of the leftist MSM who will label all such riots as 'peaceful protests'. Then when conservatives make even one such similar action, us commie-socialist dirtbags will squeal louder than a greased pig at a 4H fair that they are insurgents trying to take over the government. Standard operating procedure right out of Rules for Radicals: "Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt" Saul Alinsky. Next demand conservatives be disarmed, but of course that will not apply to us:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/07/26/04/31204458-8559841-image-a-2_1595734737919.jpg

The hypocrisy and deceit of commies and socialists is equaled only by their mastery of 'cognitive dissonance' and intentional obliviousness.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

These links and the what is mentioned here are all part of an impressive propaganda campaign by right-wing groups that has seemingly convinced millions of Americans into believing that the peaceful BLM protestors were the ones causing much of the damage last year. There are videos of white, anonymous, visitors from other cities fire bombing buildings, some of them being stopped by BLM protestors. If you want to see videos of violent protests, see the video dump of the 6 January terrorist attack on the US Capitol Building. WSJ, Fox, Daily Mail, Sinclaire, &c are required by their fascist owners to spread lies and misleading information. They are inciting violence, and have absolutely no credibility. And they are also the MSM, making you and others believe that peaceful protestors are dangerous. Why is that? Because those fascist MSM companies will only support authoritarian regimes, and are trying to permit police violence, and limit democracy.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Rules for Radicals: "Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt" Saul Alinsky.

Yep...true to form!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, Trump and Republicans have had a habit of this.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And there you go again. Your obsession with Jewboy Saul's Rules For Radicals is precious!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really what's primarily at issue in my posts.

[–]CarlDung 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Holy shit reddit actually made me suck nigger dicks before they allowed me to post anything!

[–]mrwizardd 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

they made me start cross dressing before i could post there. http://old.reddit.com/r/sissies

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps CarlDung prefers blowjobs to cross dressing?

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They told me that only sexy chicks with dicks were allowd to mod there.

[–]mrwizardd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that is pretty much true.

http://old.reddit.com/r/sissies

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What was their reaction, CarlDung, when you told them Reddit ordered you to fellate them?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They told me I had a purty mouth.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

No you wouldn't. Not only would you not fight for my free speech, but you kicked me off of your subreddits when you had them. I was booted from your Tusli Gabbard, Trump, and Chimpire forums. Then you cry like little babies when reddit banned you. Fuck you you mother fucking hypocrits!

[–]fediverseshill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What did you say in the tulsi subs to get banned though?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All you have to say about Tusli Gabbard to get banned from her supporters sub is the truth.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In other words, MSM propaganda, Zucky Zoidberg disinformation, and your leftist feelings. Truth? Yeah, right!