Leaked discussions reveal uncertainty about transgender care - The files shed light on a controversial area of medicine that has largely retreated into the shadows

submitted by neolib from (economist.com)

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]neolib[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Archived: https://archive.is/6HBWQ

The discussions of its members show that the provision of so-called gender-affirming care is riddled with far more doubt than WPATH’s outward message that such interventions are “not considered experimental”.

I didn't expect to find quotes like this one in The Economist!

UPD #WPATHFiles hashtag on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/hashtag/WPATHFiles

Genspect's thread: https://twitter.com/genspect/status/1764802687357366433

Michael Shellenberger's thread: https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1764799914918490287

Graham Linehan's thread: https://twitter.com/Glinner/status/1764802370351812849

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Helen Joyce was the former editor of The Economist, which is probably why they have more secular coverage of gender issues.

[–]xoenix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Looked for this on Reddit. It's been posted in a few conservative and smaller subs but no mainstream/trans subs have dared to challenge it yet.

Oh wait, r/LibertarianUncensored is apparently very pro gender religion. 🤡

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see it's posted in Canada_sub but the thread was locked before anyone could reply. At least the link is there.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Transgender "care".