Trying to protect your kids from predators is kinkshaming

submitted by Zoomergroid from reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]QueenBread 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Yeah, a teacher whose particular fetish is barely legal porn is not a teacher. He's a sexual assault waiting to happen. If I were her, I'd report that and get him fired.

Female teachers can get fired for sending a porn video to their own adult boyfriend. But male teachers can perv on porn featuring extremely young teens that look like their students?

Hey, losers, it may come as a surprise to you, but most normal people don't feel the need to perv on pubescent teens half your age.

[–]wylanderuk 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

but most normal people don't feel the need to perv on pubescent teens half your age.

Tell that to the large number of female teachers that get in trouble for if it was male teacher would be called statutory rape everywhere its reported but when its a female teacher its "having relations/a relationship/some other softening language".

But no doubt you will twist your self into a pretzel shape to blame men/boys somehow.

Or shit like this

[–]QueenBread 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

"Large number of female teachers". You know, this is called the DARVO system. Do you know why women who commit such felonies are left scot free? Because it's so fucking rare and so harmless that the justice system doesn't even care. I am so happy to know I am so not dangerous that the legal system laughs at the notion I could be dangerous, it's sooooo empowering. (Pro tip: 98% of rape and of crime is commited by men.)

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So there you have it, sexual assult aginst children is fine when women do it, but a man watching legal porn is harmfull.

You really are a piece of barely human shite.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not even trying to explain how you completely missed the point.

[–]wylanderuk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

In other words even you can't twist your way out this in your own head...

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Listen, you little shit, it's not my fault nobody taught you reading comprehension in school. Go back to read my comments, I'm not repeating myself for someone with the IQ of broccoli.

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you know why women who commit such felonies are left scot free? Because it's so fucking rare and so harmless that the justice system doesn't even care

You are out and out stating that sexual assault by a woman on a fucking child is rare and harmless, I hope you never have access to children you fucking freak.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Get help.