you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alladd 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

love the responses that are like "if the kids consent, what's the problem?"

this is the same generation that thinks students don't understand the gravity of and thus can't consent to loans, but sure chop your cock off

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nobody in their right minds would let a 16-year-old kid get a face tattoo based on the fact that they most likely won't want a face tattoo at 26. The idea that "kids just know" about their "true identity" in their teenage years is crazy in and of itself. People will seriously look back at this in a few decades and ask what the fuck the adults were thinking...

[–]alladd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

nowadays whenever someone says that i just assume they want to fuck kids.

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's basically the next logical stop... If you're going to argue that kids are mature enough at 14 to make decisions about their bodies that will unquestionably impact their entire lives, how could you possibly argue that the same 14 year old kid isn't old enough to consent to intercourse? Intercourse could have a life-long impact, but not necessarily; so how do you defend forbidding that when you're arguing that something that will have a life-long impact is permissible?

The whole thing is nonsensical.

[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

not to mention they literally have "thought leaders" in their fucking ideology going on about how kids are all secret sluts and it's totally heteronormative NOT to groom them etc