you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alladd 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

don't they realize the horrible optics of going after another charity? they must really believe the narrative will always be on their side to be this aggressively censorial. they better hope no one actually reads or hears any of the substance of what's being discussed as a result because that's gonna change a lot of minds real quickly.

[–]Riothamusidentifies as sane 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Optics? Have you seen these fucking people?

If they cared about optics they wouldn't leave the house dressed in fishnets. If they cared about optics they wouldn't record themselves jacking off in women's restrooms.

[–]OuroborosTheory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's a "bag lady threshold": is someone minimally familiar with conditioner? or is it a big ol' rat's nest?