TRANSGENDERInvalidating a males neovagina is more violent than actual violence

submitted by [deleted] from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

A serious question here.

Would you prefer if I told you that the reason I am not interested in sex with you is because you are trans? Or would you prefer I simply tell a half lie and say it's because you are unattractive and ugly? Perhaps telling you I think your personality is ugly is better? Or will that cause a disphoria because you identify as a nice person?

Or are these supposed reasons never really stated? I'd expect in 99.9% of situations that you are getting rejected softly with normal white lies like, you aren't my type. Rather than the unstated meaning of that which is more like "you look ugly to me".

[–]IridescentAnaconda 22 insightful - 9 fun22 insightful - 8 fun23 insightful - 9 fun -  (3 children)

The correct answer is: you are not allowed to say no.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But no means no. And I don't even have to give a reason. But if you must ask for a reason, know the reason is because you asked for a reason, which shows a disrespect for my own autonomy and is by it's nature consentphobic.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Don't you understand? Saying "no" is violence. It calls out for a legal solution. He wants it to be illegal to not fuck him.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No means no. Not dropping the issue after constitutes intentional sexual harassment and I can file a legal complaint there.