you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's what I hate the most honestly: race and sex-based issues being tied into LGBTQ2IA$$+ issues by default, and in the same vein LGB issues being irrevocably tied into the TQ2IA$$+. Never mind the fact that all these categories are quite separate with their own nuances and should be treated as such if you want to make any meaningful change. But nope, they all have to be lumped in with each other under the crazy leftist umbrella.

[–]Datachost 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's funny to me that the UK government recently announced they'd stop using BAME in official communications, because they've realised that those are distinct groups, with a vast array of experiences and problems separate to each group. Yet they continue to use LGBTQIABBQ. It's even worse there, since the latter half of the acronym actively works against the other half's interests. The Ts effectively expect every gay person to be bi & the Qs basically want there to be no boundaries at all

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol that acronym with the dollar signs is perfect for the hostile takeover of gay rights groups by capitalism.

How can we force gays to buy our useless shit?

I know, make straight people "gay" by having them buy weird outfits, hormones, and the same products but with a rainbow and double the price!