Bombshell! As Promised, Assange Dumps ALL Wikileaks Files – Here They Are!

submitted by HeyImSancho from (rumormillnews.com)

all 31 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Wanga 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Why did you link to this weird shit instead of directly to https://file.wikileaks.org/file/

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

me? If I didn't find it, then why should I post something to take some sort of quasi credit for it? I just post it from the place I found it; why not?

[–]Wanga 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

It's just better etiquette to link to the directest source possible.

The source you linked to does nothing but say 'here's the link to Wikileaks' and it runs Google and Facebook Javascript

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

So, I'm not going to change how I post, I believe in giving credit to where I find information. If you don't like what I post, don't read, or participate; I'm fine with that. I'm sure there are numerous subs to participate in. Also, from what I've read, if you block 'sundogsplace', you won't have to see me at all. Have a great life, good travels, and good times on your journey through this life.

EDITED: changed ban to block, I do post as heyimsancho, but mainly in sundogsplace.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I think having a higher quality source is more important than keeping track of where you personally saw the information, just my 2 cents

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

"Higher quality"; Love that. I'm building up quite the piggy bank(2 cents;) with entirely off topic suggestions, and responses.

Life isn't fair, it's not perfect, and it comes in all flavors; we don't always get what we want, when we want it, and somethings are just uncomfortable.

I'm comfortable in my being, my life, and my style, but thanks for the suggestion. My suggestion, and I do mean this, if the manner in which I present anything, isn't up to the reader's personal expectations, then don't read, or comment on the screed I post.

It's really the secret to life, learning oneself, and being comfortable with that! :)

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Well that's great and convenient for you, but not so great for everyone else who has to read the lower-quality source. Life isn't just about what you want :) This is a community

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Right, and there are plenty of subs to hang out on. I've read where I believe it was you, that for anyone who doesn't like what someone posts, to simply block it, and presto, not seen. Is that too hard to do? I mean this thread is jacked, all off topic, am I to care? Like the saying goes, 'it takes 2 to tango'.

Let's talk 'high quality sources'. Is there a list? I've gone to RumorMillNews for a very long time. Some of there stuff I like, and a lot I don't like. I've learned to treat life like this, none of us are bound by some code to conform, or please others, or displease others. Life is a choice.

So as to the "Quality Sources", please, approved list?

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I mean posting from wiki leaks itself is obviously better than a place called "rumor mill"? Is that not obvious?

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Did you not find 'wiki leaks' just about as fast as a click?

The sites linked to(for threads), as far as I can tell always populate to the right of all threads on the front page of the subs, or main area; if people don't like the links, don't go.

And no, I always look at substance over appearance. I'm not a libtard, or SJW, actually just 'different', having that said though, the idea of appearance over substance is a catalyst of hate; at least to myself.

In regards to 'Obvious', we're all here(I mean on Earth), to learn, grow, experience, and who knows any other purpose; perhaps the learning of time itself, is the great achievement here on this Earth.

But I'll always give credit, and I'll always look for substance over appearance.

[–]313337 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

This isn't fucking new shit. Why do people keep posting this bullshit?

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Can you elaborate? I've not seen this before. Are you the post monitor? How many have posted it? When was it first posted?

I really don't care for drive by diarrhea.

[–]313337 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How about a direct shit in your mouth by the horse itself...

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1117123131804737541

"Note: https://file.wikileaks.org/ is not a release, insurance dump, or response to Assange’s arrest. It is the page where published documents are available for bulk download so that people can create mirrors, access publications offline, or use the raw data. It has existed for years."

10:51 AM - 13 Apr 2019

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, like I said, I just post from where I got the information. I don't know about any shit in my mouth, not really my thing bro.

[–]313337 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're the one that brought up diarrhea. I guess that happens though when you are shotgun shitposting.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, lol, and you're the shitty one line poster bent on letting everyone know either how bad of a mood your in, or your superiority? Man, you've got me, I give up, you win, I bow to your excellence.... Does that make you feel better snowflake?

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Posted By: Lymerick

Date: Sunday, 14-Apr-2019 17:37:42

That's pretty new though the dates on the files are all 01-Jan-1984 01:01

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/

I wonder if 1984 [<-- click the "JPG"] is intentionally ominous.

[–]SundogsPlace 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You must be a Liberal. There are a lot of people who are busy working and raising families, who don't sit in front of the computer 24/7, who haven't already seen this news. What's wrong with someone sharing something you've already seen? Why come in with such a bad attitude, when you can just opt not to read it?

[–]313337 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The point of my post was the headline was wrong. It was not a dump from Assange and they are not all there. The files linked have been up forever. It's not a bombshell, it's bullshit. I'd rather not waste time on clear bullshit and if I post to call someone out on bullshit, it's so others don't waste time. I'm not sure why you think I'm a liberal.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

American media has been frightened away from publishing WikiLeaks material.

Also, this is the type of post where the Shills will forum slide and try to hijack and interesting comments.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quote: ""This is absolutely incredible and for those who actually do investigative journalism, this is going to be source material for possibly years to come. As co-founder of Wikileaks Julian Assange was arrested and dragged from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, he stated the files would be dumped, and unlike the state controlled media, you could bank on him following through with what he said. "*

Cool, I wonder what's there. It always seemed like Wikileaks was a little short on promises, and conveniently often enough would carry a narrative that was complementary to the the establishment. I look forward to what news is created out of the documents.

[–]313337 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wikileaks twitter refutes your imagination.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1117123131804737541

"Note: https://file.wikileaks.org/ is not a release, insurance dump, or response to Assange’s arrest. It is the page where published documents are available for bulk download so that people can create mirrors, access publications offline, or use the raw data. It has existed for years."

10:51 AM - 13 Apr 2019

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Has anyone had a look? I spent a few hours and didn't find anything juicy

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I've not spent much time looking. I doubt there will be anything that jumps out at face value, it may take a lot of correlation, and perhaps bookmarking of material to come back to later when if at all any context can be found....just my opinion

[–]Zombi 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

"Serving Truth and Freedom Worldwide since 1996"

Don't worry, the website design makes that blatantly obvious lmao.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

LMAO, picking on appearance over substance.

[–]Zombi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well of course, the website looks like it's straight out of the 90's! Either way, the substance was already there and has been for years. It's not a bombshell, more like a re-release.

[–]HeyImSancho[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shit, I never thought about how the site looked, or the name; my god, I appreciate everyone for clearing this up for me. I'll remember next time to ask the group for my next decision in my life.