all 4 comments

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Dark Matter Stars Might Explode & Heat Up Universe, New Theory Says

Unfortunately, if axions existed, they would  be emitted in large numbers from neutron stars,   and the neutron stars would  cool very quickly. By 1980   it was clear that observations were just  incompatible with the existence of axions. After that happened, physicists came up  with various amendments to the original   axion hypothesis that would make the  particle more difficult to detect. So   not only was the axion invented for an  unscientific reason – it was to make a   perfectly fine theory prettier.  But after it had been ruled out,   particle physicists made it even more unscientific  by amending a theory that didn’t explain anything. These new types of axions have now grown to  an entire army called “axion-like particles”   and there are dozens of experiments looking for  those particles. They continue to not find them.

Steady-state universe model stays behind it. In dense aether model universe is and stays random, it has no evolution hardwired in it. The effect known as a red shift is the result of light dispersion on intergalactic dark matter (it's lightest part being specific, i.e. scalar waves resulting from quantum noise of vacuum). But we still observe evolution of galaxies. This is because their matter gets permanently recycled: they evaporate into dark matter and photons just for to condense somewhere else from dark matter and photons pretty much like random clouds on summer sky.

We even know about first stage of galaxy development, which is known as so-called quasars. These objects result from gravitational collapse of large clouds of dark matter, condensing in free space between existing galaxies. In some theories they're called gravastars or dark matter stars but they're actually a mixture of dark matter and highly ionized interstellar dust. In dense aether model dark matter is composed of multiple fractions, lightweight scalar waves, "warm" dark matter composed of their solitons (neutrinos) and positrons and "hot" dark matter, i.e. highly ionized atom nuclei. All these constituents repel at distance but gravity can occasionally overcome this repulsion once these clouds become too large and/or dense. During this massive blast of photons get released and the rest, rich of longitudinal waves of vacuum remains - so-callled active galactic nuclei, i.e. spherical dust galaxy.

Spherical galaxies radiate excess of dark matter through their poles of rotation and they undergo compactification further into a classical rod-like and then pancake-like shape. When most of dark matter gets evaporated, their central black holes cease in activity and the galaxy changes into a quiescent elliptical galaxy with slow activity: the dark matter evaporated around them gets prepared into a new condensation. From more general perspective this process can be described as a passage of low-dimensional Universe brane through hyperdimensional Universe: some part of Universe evaporate for to condense somewhere else. See also:

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to above theory given the right circumstances, axions just clump onto each other and those axion clumps have been called “axion stars”. They don’t look anything like our stars though because they don’t do nuclear fusion. There are no nuclei to fuse there and if the axion starts get too big they become unstable, and if they become unstable, they could explode. And if they could explode that could release radiation which would heat up the gas in the vicinity. And that might be observable.

And this is what they looked at in the new paper. They asked: If those axion stars were produced in the early universe, and they exploded, what would this have done to the gas because that could still be observable today. They looked at CMB data and didn’t find any evidence of axion star explosions. As it’s common habit among physicists, this isn’t called a negative result, but an “interesting constraints”. And also in line with physicists’ habits, they then say that a next generation of experiments might be able to find the missing evidence.

If dark matter exists, which it may not, and if it’s made of axions, for which there is no reason, and if these axions form stars , and if these stars have the right properties to explode, and if the axions couple strongly enough to release photons, then that could leave some observable traces in the interstellar gas, that could probably also be caused by many other astrophysical effects. The most interesting part is that people still get paid for this...

Sabine's laments are easily understandable, but - aside of quasars which were simply overlooked by the above theory like the proverbial shadow under the candlestick - there are already observable indicia of this process in so-called lampposts of black holes. Black holes spew large amount of dark matter through their polar jets so that it can cumulate along their axis and form of miniscule quasars so to say, which periodically explode. They're just not formed with axions, which really belong into quite different energy density spectrum. But large part of scalar waves of Nicola Tesla really follows Peccey-Quinn symmetry - in this sense they can be called "axion-like", despite that in their majority they're simply random.

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Dark matter is pure fiction.

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dark matter is pure fiction

I'm often hearing this from people, who distrust Einstein and relativity theory too.

But dark matter was found just by its deviations from relativity theory and ignored by mainstream physics for fifty years as such.