Revisiting the hot model problem - there is still reason to doubt very high climate sensitivity models

submitted by [deleted] from theclimatebrink.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Find Hot models in the internet!!! (joking)

The hot models exaggerate the changes in weather. They usually use a positive feedback loop in the model that turns any change into a disaster. And due to the promotion of climate-alarmism nonsense it gets a lot of views. It also gets a lot of money from the WEF and such.

In reality there is a negative feedback loop that restricts the climate. A very simple one that is always missed is that outward radiation increases with temperature4 (power of 4). So a small change in temperature gives a huge difference in outward radiation. Which limits a rise in temperature enormously.

The models usually forget that CO2 has a very limited effect on green-house effect. It has a very thin bandwidth. Water has a far greater effect. The effect of CO2 is also to its maximum, while the concentration of CO2 was much more in historical times. Plants are now closer to starving from lack of CO2. Earth was much hotter in the middle ages. Greenland was used by Vikings to harvest hop for beer.

[–]ZephirAWT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In my theory 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 the heat is produced geothermally, which releases greenhouse gases from underground/underseas.

So yes: the current problem of climate modelling is real and carbon dioxide levels and temperatures are correlated more strongly than climate models generally suggest - just their causality gets exactly the opposite. After all, scientists know for many years, that there is lag of carbon dioxide levels behind global temperatures - they just learned to ignore it as a single man due to a-social demand for AGW from progressivist corporations.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Great addition.
I think that the geothermal heating has made Venus so extremely hot.

Here is my complete overview:
https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/global-warming-science

The reverse causality comes from CO2 being released from hot water.
Cold water can hold more CO2, and this gets released AFTER heating the water.

[–]ZephirAWT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The reverse causality comes from CO2 being released from hot water

Actually hot water containing calcium and magnesium salts absorbs and precipitates CO2 instead. But there another sources of CO2 from geovolcanic (hydrotermal vents) and from permafrost, and seabed methane, which are released during warming of Earth crust.