There's some censorship going on in the newly popular feminist subs and it needs to be openly addressed.

submitted by [deleted] from (self.SaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus-Christ 72 insightful - 14 fun72 insightful - 13 fun73 insightful - 14 fun -  (3 children)

So you essentially don't want people questioning this ideaology of yours because you ""know"" you're right. That's a great way to go about things.

[–]GConly 25 insightful - 9 fun25 insightful - 8 fun26 insightful - 9 fun -  (2 children)

Don't get me started. Any deviation from radical feminist theory got you banned on Reddit GC.

My prime example is the brain sex thing. Virtually every published paper demonstrates sex differences in brain structure, but GC repeatedly posts the same three authors (Joel etc) that deny it and ignore the thousands of papers and scientists that observe it as fact.

Which is going to backfire in the end.

[–]wardrobe 30 insightful - 2 fun30 insightful - 1 fun31 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Respectfully, the studies say that people's brains are a mish mash of "typically male and female" structures and not two clear cut brains. If actual brain sex were real that would legitimise transgenderism because people's bodies actually could be misaligned with their brain. Humans are more complicated than that.

[–]Earl_Harbinger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some variation within a sex doesn't make it a 'mishmash'. Most characteristics affected by sexual dimorphism result in a bimodal distribution, as it does with height in humans.

As it has already been pointed out, 'transgenders' have the brain of the sex they are. There were a lot of claims to the contrary being pushed but the difference was only on a small subset of characteristics, a subset of the individuals, and within their sex's normal distribution.