you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]lolreallyno4 40 insightful - 3 fun40 insightful - 2 fun41 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I don't see how they haven't been "honest about it". It's quite clear what the sub is for.

If your only issue is that they haven't removed themselves from All, then that's your complaint and the rest of your post is superfluous. I'm sure the mods at /s/GenderCritical would be happy to do that.

[–]gparmesan 31 insightful - 3 fun31 insightful - 2 fun32 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

This has been changed. Thanks for your patience with a brand new mod team, much appreciated.

[–]ManWithABanana 23 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks for complying with rule 4b. Also, welcome to you and all refugees.

I have been seeing tons of gendercritical posts on /s/all for the past day. When I just checked, they are all gone.

[–]gparmesan 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

thanks for your kind reply. I created the sub on the fly and I didn't have it unchecked.

[–]teelo 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Just because you've removed it from /all doesn't give you a pass to remove comments posted while it was still appearing on /all.

[–]jelliknight 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why not, though?

It's a curated sub now. Imagine if I had a gardening sub, and people were posting irrelevant stuff, or comments about how gardening is stupid. I take it off r/all to make it a better space for the people who want to learn about tomatoes. Why shouldn't I be able to remove the comments that never fitted the goal and wouldn't be allowed now?

Is there an explicit rule about this?