Why do people pretend that only wanting the top 5% of men isn't genocide under the UN definition?

submitted by MVP0 from self.RealIncels

Literally genocide.

I have no opportunities therefore will never reproduce even if I was a retard who wanted to.

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Because the rest of the world is actually hoping you don't.

[–]MVP0[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The world is hoping for bald fat breediots? Sounds blackpilling.

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, much like with women, seems you also do not understand speech. The rest of the world is hoping you do not reproduce. We do not need our collective IQ shrunk even more from your spawn, as well as you teaching the child just how mean the poow wittle womenz are to you.. wahhh.

[–]MVP0[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That's right, you're saying the world is hoping that things stay the same and bald fat breediots keep reproducing and creating retards like you. (Instead of actually superior men benefitting from sexual marxism.)

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, at least we know why no one wants to be with you.... you are willfully stupid. Cool, with that we certainly done here, my time is better spent staring at a wall than talking with you, it will get more done and I will likely learn more.

[–]bitc0in 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

top 1%

80/20 rule is bluepill cope

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

false premise, the UN definition is shit

[–]MVP0[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am asking why they are pretending...

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

questions based on a false premise are unanswerable, it's a logical principle

[–]MVP0[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The people who support the UN definition are pretending it doesn't extend to women. Cry.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is actually a very good question. UN definition is trash, but I would use this in bad faith

[–]MVP0[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Idk how this is bad faith...

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I personally don't agree that what your post decribes is genocide, so when I use this argument, it's in bad faith.