you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Her article is still stuck in the mindset of trickle down sexonomics. If she were serious, she wouldn't try to solve the problem with modern approaches like more casual sex, which got us into this mess in the first place

[–]GONUTS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Casual sex is an extremely, extremely, extremely rare occurrence. Even sex that you think is casual is literally something the woman is not doing intrinsically but for a relationship which gives her status and resources. "More casual sex" has never been tried in the past, since we have gone for the approach of keeping women fair by forcing them not to, but never forcing them TO (with men who aren't winner category individuals).