It doesn't make sense, because the justification for why we should not force them to have sex is the justification for why we should force them not to have it AKA why sex shouldn't exist. Every reasoning leads back to "sex is bad/sin/immoral/weird/overly important/trivial" and therefore very heavily leads to forcing women to not have it, unless you're a redditor. Even if you were to say you don't care about contradicting yourself, you'd still be left in a position where you did in fact say sex is bad inherently when you commented on the disadvantaged man. The reality is that there's nothing wrong (or remotely dangerous) about sex. Of course the "sex is dangerous" myth comes from the men who have sex being inferior and therefore somehow messing up and getting the girl pregnant which it takes a moron to do, drunk or not. Therefore when a disadvantaged male wants sex, you can't say it's immoral, you can't say it's creepy, it's not trivial, it's not overly entitled to think you're owed it.
Basically "This thing that motivated your actions is horrible and you're insane, and it is also what I myself engaged in an hour ago. But if others attack the system because they are utterly denied it on every conceivable level, they must again be insane."
there doesn't seem to be anything here