you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Have you tried wearing a wedding ring? I hear guys who put on a ring suddenly get all the pussy. Women want what other women want.

If you're really desperate, go to a 12 step meeting. There's tons of fucked up women there who have obliterated their previous relationships and need someone to care for them. Junkies need love too.

Or big girls. That's just more woman to love.

F2M pre-op tranny, she'll probably let you fuck her in the ass.

Femcels, why haven't the femcel and incel factions gotten together? It seems so logical.

And are you trying your luck with enough women here? Even guys who seem like total Chads who get laid all the time strike out a lot. It's a numbers game. If 1 out of 100 women decide to sleep with you, that's still 100% success.

Don't discount grannies either. Old girls need the cock too. Get you some silver fox.

[–]LadiesMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Female junkie standards are still female standards. For example, one study showed that 94% of women will reject a man solely for him being too short. That's "women" not "Stacey volleyball players", just to restate. Our pathetic standards ("please love me") aren't the problem.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm looking at Stulp's work:

while average height men experienced greater reproductive success than taller or shorter men ([13]; findings that were replicated by [14] and [15])

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.0211

[–]LadiesMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

born between 1937 and 1940

We're talking older than literal boomers. And it was "average" (equivalent to 5'10 now) height not short, and in a more traditionally monogamous society.

This is TinderWorld 2023.