Voat Registration is Open Again

submitted by [deleted] from voat.co

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]gretathroatborg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

it means faggots that can't make it on their own but also aren't strong enough to steal my shit want to use a bloated government to do it, for my own good btw

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

How does one "make it on their own" and what does it mean?

[–]gretathroatborg 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

figure out how to offer something of value to someone else. if you can't, you have no value and should die of starvation and be shit out of the gene pool

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Ah, social Darwinism. Is there any particular reason why we should participate in social darwinism? Because the last time i checked most people are pretty much against this ideology.

[–]gretathroatborg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

it's the natural order. why should we circumvent it by subsidizing genetic trash that shouldn't continue on?

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Someone's success is determined entirely by genetics? Are you into racial realism by any chance my dude?

[–]gretathroatborg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

not entirely. well races have differences if that's what you mean. btw answer my question you deceptive nigger jew

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

btw answer my question you deceptive nigger jew

First you need to give me a non-fallacious question you retarded redneck-faggot.

Why are you talking about "genetic trash" and "natural order" if you think that peoples success isnt entirely determined by genetics?

Fuck, i've seen this type of fallacy described somewhere but i dont remember the exact name of it, so annoying. Or maybe there is multiple. You both ask a rhetorical question AND its a black and white fallacy.

[–]gretathroatborg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

still not answering. carry your own dead wood faggot

[–]WebcomicAddiction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok retard.

  1. Peoples success isnt entirely determined by genetics. In fact, unless there is some really bad genetic disorder genetics barely matter.
  2. We value personal freedoms over "convenience" of the rest of the population. If you disagree then i suggest you to move to china.
  3. Sometimes factors that influence someones "success" are out of control of the said person.
  4. If someone has a "bad streak" in their life it doesnt mean that they will be useless for the society in the future.
  5. The definition of "success" is vague as shit and its hard to judge how "useful" some one is to the society based on that definition.
  6. We are very capable of feeding some extra people without decreasing the life quality of the rest of the population.
  7. Charity is good for your mental health.
  8. Egoistic altruism is a thing.

There you go. Some logical arguments from the top of my head.

You satisfied now? Or you are going to keep calling me names and using fallacies?

Edit: you can also add: 9. We have charity as a social contract.