***REDDIT MELTDOWN WATCH*** RITTENHOUSE NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES

submitted by Tarrock from (self.MeanwhileOnReddit)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The bigger question is: if you don't want a law against reckless endangerment that leads to homicide, do you really want armed teenagers walking around shooting anyone who gets close to them? Perhaps this law?: reckless endangerment that leads to homicide is legal IF you kill people who aren't likable.

[–]Noam_Chomsky 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

reckless endangerment that leads to homicide is legal IF you kill people who aren't likable the key witness admits during cross examination that the defendant was acting in self defense.

FTFY

It's natural law.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You know that this is cherry picking

[–]Noam_Chomsky 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You know that this is cherry picking

It is apparent to anyone who reads your comments that you are willfully misinformed.

The prosecuting attorney literally facepalmed himself after his witness told the court it was self defense.

He admitted it was self defense. It's in the public record.

Subjectively omitting the relevant factual info is cherry picking.

Hypocrites are embarrassed to be associated with you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you have to resort to personal attacks? What a weakling.

Cherry picking: you selected one example that does not itself fit an argument regarding the other two victims.