This got me 2 week ban from r/unpopularopinion for breaking the "be civil" rule
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from (i.imgur.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
Hmm fair enough although i wasn't talking about my personal experience. The reason i was so confident was because pretty recently i had just read about this study where they scanned women's brains while showing them different stimuli and even when the women knew their brains were hooked up to a scanner they still couldn't bring themselves to be honest about what turned them on.
[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
They hooked a probe up in her cooter that could tell when she was getting moist. Men got an erection measurer. They asked everyone to watch pornos and say when they were turned on. Men knew when they were turned on, gay men too. But women? They said they weren't turned on but the probe up her cooter said otherwise. Would like a link to the study as I've been looking for it.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (2 children)
There's this which goes into theories as to why as well as links to a meta analysis: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/love-sex-and-babies/201105/why-do-women-get-physically-aroused-and-not-even-know-it
Here's the meta analysis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811244/
[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
That is a terrible article written by a woman who appears to be a feminist and is writing defensively and dishonestly.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (0 children)
Yeah that's just what came up when i searched for it now. I think where i read about it recently was when i was looking for research to back up a different reddit argument i was having which i think is pretty entertaining if you want to check out: https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/gltiei/actually_gonna_be_banned_omegalul/fr2f0ya/?context=3
Pretty sure it was mentioned in 1 or more of those links. On second glance it might've been in other articles i was scrolling through while i was looking.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)