Redditor finds evidence AI commenting might be far more widespread than we think
submitted 3 years ago by magnora7 from (i.imgur.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7[S] 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Very interesting to consider... I think this guy might have a point.
[–]soundsalad 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
2982eop2l2,2,292ok,2292922el2e9292I agree. Great comment!bloop p202e202dd,3.3.3.3.00dkd,3,33..00kdl=-o21=eo-94i040=2-4023-23////23-23/...
[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
I agree.
I've thought about how difficult it would be to shill at a conspiracy truth site without being affected by the facts that you learn while shilling.
I'd be thrilled to learn that some intel shill was saving everything until they got out of the service.
Then they could drop a conspiracy truth megabomb with a data dump.
TPTB could easily avoid this, if they had access to robot shills similar to the ones suggested in this post.
It's depressing news for the free-speech community.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7[S] 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]soundsalad 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun - (0 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)