you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]grammaroo 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

im getting the sense we need to "gatekeep" what it means to be a liberal but we have such a large group of coalitions that dont even belong within the liberal community and are just there to exploit the liberal principals and not contribute to them that we would collapse without this coalition. But there are way, waaay to many people who just think liberal = being nice to people and if you're nice to a bunch of hateful bigots, then surely they'd change their ways. Funny how these hysterical idiots understand that being nice to nazis isnt effective but they tell gays and women to shut up when it comes to groups of people whose homophobia would make the nazis blush. I wonder what the difference is. Could it be that gays and lesbians and most women are pushovers and these white liberals who hush us are afraid of black people so submit to not offending them but the homosexual community is expected to be "enlightened" and make space for psychotic homophobia because its a sign of poverty and we should respect them because they dont know any better.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, liberals is wrong. I'm technically liberal too. I meant more like progressives intersectional type. The one who cares about identity then anything else. They got a pyramid of identity, and on this pyramid black people and muslims come before white men and women and gay people.So, according to this bs, we must to cater to their problems, even if this ends up totally damaging women and gays rights and interest. It's about identity, not principals. That's why dont' care if mass immigration from muslim country will end up damaging gays and women and in general freedom.