you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PeterFromRuqqus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Maybe you can show the difference in tinder likes for men vs women? Blackpill your whole class brocel.

[–]Mazurro[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It won't work because it is not how you build an econometric model.

I am meassuring number of single men using some correlated variables with that, for example parenting problems, mental issues, social media growth etc.

If I could get a data of % of left swipes every next year it would work.

[–]Mazurro[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Or I know, even better - I will use difference between women and men left swipes for it, it might work.

But there is problem, my data is 1992-2018, and Tinder isn't that long there.

[–]PeterFromRuqqus 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Tinder started in 2012 I think, so you can only start from there.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, 6 observation aren't enough and would fuck it up, especially when we know how stats changes during those 6 years and some observations will be straight dropped because of it. Need to think about different one.

[–]PeterFromRuqqus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If you are going through the social media route, perhaps facebook likes are a good metric... Facebook came out in 2004!

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's better, but still too little. Also, its hard to meassure facebook liked towards some categories of stuff.