This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Some thoughts on rules #1 and #3.

submitted by [deleted] from self.Incels

There have been some conflicts here between me and some other members.

There's a rule for no fakecels, right.

This is an online forum, and we can't sure whether everyone here is an incel or a fakecel.

If someone is a fakecel and wants to be here because he's blackpilled, he must be indistinguishable from other members. Everyone is assumed to be an incel until proven wrong.

I think this sums up rules #1 and #3. From this point on I'll be stricter with the bragging (fakecels).

Based on this, I think there needs to be an overhaul on rule changes.

Instead of no roasties and soyboys, there will be a "no gaslighting" rule, which will overlap with rule #2.

Instead of no faggots and trannies, there will be a "no soliciting sex" rule.

A poll has been made to let you guys vote: https://www.strawpoll.me/18829312

Additional:

  • 60% of votes are needed for an option to win.

  • The minimum amount of voters needs to be 15.

  • Poll will end when this thread is 24 hours old.

all 12 comments
sorted by:
random
topnewinsightfulfun
this thread is in contest mode - contest mode randomizes comment sorting, hides scores, and collapses replies by default.

[–]Beefstone [score hidden]  (0 children)

I just want the tallcel clowning to stop.

[–]FACEandLMS [score hidden]  (1 child)

There's a rule for no fakecels, right. From this point on I'll be stricter with the bragging (fakecels).

Can I still post here if my girlfriend is only a 7/10?

jk obv

[show replies]

[–]hybristophilia [score hidden]  (0 children)

Why change those rules concerning trannies, homo dogs and foids?

They shouldn't be allowed. R9k is tranny central. Foids ruin everything. An open poll means even IT can vote.

[–]mlcurrycel [score hidden]  (0 children)

I vited yes but I want the no toastier no granny rule to stay

[–]curryvirgin [score hidden]  (1 child)

I think it's a bit arbitrary to use a poll to decide this, given the issues others have mentioned. I think it'd be better to just include the general rule, and then indicate the purpose:

No gas lighting (i.e. No roastie/soyboyposting)

No suggestions of soliciting sex/alternative sexuality (i.e. No faggots and trannies)

To be honest, there's probably good discussion that could be had around soliciting, either in itself or around sex bot brothels, whether or not it is beneficial or destructive, etc. I guess there's a difference between suggesting it and discussing it, though.

[show replies]

[–]FuckReddit87 [score hidden]  (1 child)

Yeah nad also make sure that gore, porn, cp, threats are included so we can tell media/detractors that we do not allow that shit

[show replies]

[–]sweaty [score hidden]  (1 child)

I'd rather keep the rules as they are

[show replies]