About the origins of the word "gender"

submitted by BiologyIsReal from (self.GCdebatesQT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

You can bash the evidence I've provided all you want, but it will always beat your lack of evidence, sorry.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Sure pal. Dodgy evidence beats common sense every time. You truly know how every single English speaker thinks about the word sex.

[–]SnowAssMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Your opinion of my evidence is less than valueless without any counter evidence on your part. Google Image results ≠ my opinion btw, you're conflating evidence with opinion again.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

You literally think your opinion is a universal thing amongst all English language speakers even when English speakers are telling you they do not use the word that way.

I might as well hand evidence to a cactus for all the good it will do. Now leave me be and enjoy your mighty reign as king of the feminists already🙄

[–]SnowAssMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

You're still repeating yourself & you're still unable to produce any evidence to back up any of the claims you've made. Take a break from the excuses & ad hominems & produce evidence for once.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Says the one who accused me of gaslighting him lmao. Grow up and give it up. It’s pathetic and really disingenuous to claim we need proof that you do not speak for all English speakers. Use your head instead of arguing from your offence at being disagreed with.

[–]SnowAssMan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

You're still repeating yourself & you're still unable to produce any evidence to back up any of the claims you've made. Take a break from the excuses & ad hominems & produce evidence for once.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Take your own advice pal. You’re the one accusing others of emotionally manipulating you.

[–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I already took my own advice. I produced evidence without excuses or ad hominems.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

No ad hominem? You accused two people of gaslighting you, but being called a gronk for refusing to see the point I’m making is an attack.. (The point I’m making is that your ‘proof’ is not actually proof of your claim, no English speakers ever use the term sex to mean anything but intercourse)