Are you now conflating how conversations work with how definitions work? I assure you, I described how definitions work accurately. Open a dictionary. ... I'll wait. ... OK. You see words with multiple definitions, and you see them numbered. You may see words with one definition. They are not because there is no need. The word in that latter case would have only one real usage. Any other usage would be at best slang, but it would not be a real meaning or use of the word. You offered multiple definitions for a word as if they were together as one. When a word legitimately has multiple definitions, numbering makes it clear what is being said. You offered two contradictory ideas smushed together like they are one. By doing that, you are erasing the one, actual, meaning of woman by conflating it with something entirely different just like you're doing here with offering a conversational example as an example of how you wish definitions work.

Everything in "QT", and now many other places, is built on fuzzy language and insisting on a lack of clarity. You are playing by your rules, but those are unworkable and self-serving. But, as you are so open about throwing everyone else under the bus, how you do not care about others and only care about yourself because you assume everyone else is like that, because you are apparently living the dream, It makes sense that you would use fuzzy language to twist it into looking like it works the way you want it to work.