you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]grixitperson 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

But I fear the information I reveal in it, and its tone, might cause me to get banned from this sub were I to post it here.

As long as it is reasonable, you will not be banned.

[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

That's good to know. Thank you. I am always nervous posting here, in part coz in the sidebar under "Moderation" it says

Rules are interpreted subjectively...

Permanent bans are instated upon mod discretion.

As a result, a lot of posts I've composed for this sub end up getting shunted off to a computer folder called "BNCI" (better not chance it), LOL.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

From what I’ve seen nobody gets banned. There was the whole rape apologist scenario and he’s not banned. You cannot be more offensive that that was.

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS[M] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That person was banned, although I have stopped short from making it permanent at the moment. They lost their ability to participate for 30 days.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Not what I was told when I brought it up on a different account (different mod told me I was free to take a break but no rules were broken) but glad to hear he was actually finally held accountable for the rampant misogyny he posts.

May I ask which 30 days? I’ll be leaving again once they are up and he is allowed back.

[–]censorshipment 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't know this until I started using my laptop... Saidit has public moderation logs: https://saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/about/log

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh that’s excellent to know! Cheers!

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS[M] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The ban took place immediately after the incident, so there 6 days remaining. They may or may not actually participate again, but if they do and make any similar statements or violate our rules, I will ban them permanently.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really appreciate you temp banning and giving a rats about the whole situation. Moderation is a shit of a job, so thank you.

I trust your decision.

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS[M] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In general, we take a light touch. If something violates a stated rule, I’ll usually ask for the user to edit. Most commonly it’s because they used a disallowed term or directly misgender a user. The only person whose actually been banned was masks.

[–]worried19[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Was that from the old sub or the new sub?

I feel bad for Masks. She seems very unhappy.

[–]grixitperson 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, i'm the founder of this sub, and i do not intend for it to be censored as long as people stay on topic. Which is why i'd like you to be a mod. Are you interested?

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure I would be suitable to be a mod for a couple of reasons. But I'm honored to be asked, and I'm interested in discussing further. I've long wanted to find out what modding entails - I am clueless - and how people become mods. I'm also curious about how sub rules are established on matters such as the terminology considered acceptable - and what the procedures are for questioning/challenging them and suggesting other alternatives.

I think these issues might be of interest to others as well. How about we start a thread on the topic and discuss both the generalities and my specifics in coming days?

[–]grixitperson 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A thread in private mail or on this sub?