you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Could you explain how they were more important in building support for the invasion?

[–]weavilsatemyface[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Good question. It is explained in the video.

The Bush administration masterfully made out that the anthrax, which came from US Army bio-warfare labs, were an attack by Saddam Hussein's Iraq, and the media repeated those claims and amplified them.

The WTC attacks were bad enough, but they were an attack on the most privileged power centers of the US. But the anthrax attacks came in the mail and felt like it could attack anyone. Liberal journalists were being attacked. Ordinary people felt like the attacks were aimed at them, not the power centers of the nation. They went out and bought anthrax-proof masks, made safe-rooms, stocked up on anti-anthrax meds.

You can also read this that explains why liberal journalists linked the anthrax attacks with Saddam Hussein and convinced them to support the unprovoked invasion, and how quickly they memory-holed that panic.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It wasn't the young alcoholic "Bush"-retard. He was more like an "announcer" that can't complete even one sentence in a grammatically correct sense. It was GEORGE H.W. BUSH and his fat-ass-oil-mishpoke.

The same guy, that plotted against all three Kennedys (killed two of them) and imported crack into L.A. black-quarters to fund fascists in Nicaragua.

Because? Yeah, well, why ? Den Haag theoretically could question him, If US could stop pointing fingers at "other" dictators and put them on themselves, finally.

Everything else is hypocrisy, while the world is watching. Nobody believes BUSH bs anymore and the only ones wondering are the Bushes themselves.

The same guy that bombed WTC, fyi.