The L.E.D. Quandary: Why There’s No Such Thing as “Built to Last”
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from (newyorker.com)
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
That article is trash. And it is not forgotten information but propaganda meant to deflect criticism.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
The lifeblood of science is critisism. The author ("as usual") only is responsible for what he actually wrote, not for what you put or interpret into it.
So imo this comment more or less is nonsense.
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Your opinion is noted and reject forthright.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
Doubtable.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
A sub dedicated to the preservation of valuable information. Post your latest finds, tips, tricks, and favorite archives.
Sub endorsed archives:
How to:
See also:
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)