all 5 comments

[–]raven9 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Every year more than 56 million people die globally. If you vaccinate the whole world in the same year that means 56 million people who would die anyway each have a 1 in 52 chance of getting their jab in the same week as they die.

To put that another way. It would be expected, by statistical probability that 1.1 million people would die in the same week as their jab or that over 160,000 would die on the same day as their jab just because they would have died then anyway. This means for the jab to be having any kind of significant mortality rate we would have to see numbers of deaths substantially higher than that.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[deleted]

    [–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Yes I did do it right to the point of a rough calculation that explains a huge number of people will die on the same day they got the jab and there isnt 160k child deaths and no one claimed there is so that point is nonsense.

    Sure, not every individual got a vaccine but so many of those who did received multiple shots so more than 7.2 billion shots were administered which is equal to more than 92% of the total global population.

    So when 56 million people die in the same year it is reasonable to say statistically, 92% of them were jabbed, right?

    That means statistically speaking somewhere around 51.5 million people will die in the same year and they were jabbed so each of them had a 1 in 356 chance that they will die on the same day they are jabbed, right?

    So, 51.5 million/365 == 141,000 people will die on the same day they received the jab.

    You might find ways to reduce that further by including some demographic analysis but you are not going to reduce it to where there is not a hugely significant number of deaths that would be expected to occur at around the same time as they were vaccinated and of course everyone like Steve Kirsh and all the rest of them know that. They are frauds and they are presenting misleading information for a reason.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      These kinds of stats are a no brainer. It's just a little bit of math and some common sense.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Dude. You made it clear you dont understand math and you dont want to learn. Thats fine. But I do so to me this is a no brainer and if you know anyone who has basic math education ask them to look at my comment and they will confirm what I told you is accurate.

        [–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        You're gonna have to do better than a minute of grid.tv