I have been thinking a lot on what makes a boy a man. First of all, a man must be a carnivore. A mother who is too kind and indulging would feminize her son. This is because kind mothers shelter their sons so much that their sons essentially drown in honey pot, their survival instinct never needed. Indeed, for a boy to be a man, he must be in touch with his primal instincts, which are developed through hardship, contact with nature, and physical exercises.

Also, in the absence of the father, the son would only be taught slave/feminine morality by his mother. A man ought also be a master and a ruler, for every man is a king of his own house. A boy who only knows slave morality would never develop a domineering will. This is one of the many reasons why single-mother households have been such a plague on the West.

Lastly, the man must also be realistic and pragmatic. Our ancestors never thought of promoting feminism or letting their gates down and letting enemies in. Why? Because our ancestors were constantly struggling for survival. There was NO room for such "fancy" fantasies. Indeed, even one small error could mean death to them. But once industrialization happened and everybody started to live super comfy, the West started to have those "ideals" because "hey let's just be happy and merry", and East Asia started to chase "little fresh meat" and BTS. This is why, contrary to the goal of many transnational organizations, I argue extreme prosperity must never happen to us. It is a direct recipe to producing a cucked populace.