sorted by:
new
hottopinsightfulfun

This AI generated image looks like a kid, is this morally wrong? by Musky in AskSaidIt

[–]rki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Socks is garbage, but he is right about how you view, treat and consume women.

This AI generated image looks like a kid, is this morally wrong? by Musky in AskSaidIt

[–]rki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The victim in viewing fake CP is the viewer.

Porn increases sexual activity. You are masterbating every time you watch it. That is sexual activity. You are confusing sexual activity with another person, which it reduces for some, but not all, and we could argue that some of that later group, it escalates exponentially. There are studies of men who are in prison for rape of children who detail how it escalated through porn.

If you're thinking there is a reasonable debate to be had about pavlovian-training yourself (the most powerful release of endorphins to a stimulus) to sexual consumption of minors, because they are drawn or AI, then I question your porn use and intelligence.

This AI generated image looks like a kid, is this morally wrong? by Musky in AskSaidIt

[–]rki 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is some tangentially related research, though - Gail Dines studied men in prison for child rape (Pornland, everyone should read it). They all claimed they weren't pedophiles, but all acknowledged they got there through porn escalation. Porn doesn't reduce sexual activity like beetus is claiming. Masterbating IS sexual activity. It may reduce sexual activity with others for some, but for others it turns up the boundary violation to 100.

Racism by Death_By_Democracy in AskSaidIt

[–]rki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As they existed, sure, although there's still 10 million natives today. That's the highest number in modern history. Would a modern day native even want to go back to the old way of living if it was possible? Not that there weren't some really appealing aspects to that sort of life, it's still pretty much like camping all the time.

We have some data on that, actually. Taos Pueblo has about 2,000 community members, and per the website (and Wiki which says its data is from 2011) 150 people choose to live the old ways at the pueblo. When we were there in 2020, it was just five families choosing to continue living that way.