Is this a physics discussion or new energy?

HolyDamn20 · 2022-10-02T07:56:28+00:00

No? Excactly.

So, that's it.

HolyDamn20 · 2022-09-30T02:12:43+00:00

A.

May I ask where are you so far?

This one is a pure dynamic method. It's harder to use a still picture or still sketch than text to explain a complicated dynamic method.

I am quiet okay in Maya, but I don't have it.

I know nothing about Blender.

So, the most reasonable and the best way to help you is what do you know so far? And where did you stuck?

B.

The calculation is way beyond my capability. And the calculation is the only right path for this kind of method. I believe physics and pencils and papers should be the very next step right after the idea.

My point is, before you jump in and build it and test it and brain storm to improve it or achive it or deny it, please calculate it, discuss it, conclude it. That's why I'm here.

So, again, let me help you while I'm capable, where did you stuck?

C.

Whether anyone liked it or casted it aside is not my concern. I had said this for several times already, I had done my part when I had shared it.

And soon enough I will stop coming by.

HolyDamn20 · 2022-09-27T22:24:17+00:00

Since these two methods are shared, I've got what I want, And no coming discussions. So this is the last response of these discussion.

If your intentions were good and were offended by me, please allow me to appoligyze for that.

If your intentions were not that good, then those were not even closed to be fair.

No willing to discuss physics? Build a small module to see it with your own eye. Then you will realize it do need to be calculated and rejected or proved by physics.

Or you can leave this post along.

If one had failed to do the discuss, test build, and ignore, then It may be hard for me to understand the good will of his.

the Water Pool: - Unless the questions were rejected or all proved by physics, or they were nothing but physical questions. - I guess the best STD1 and STD2 would be some where around the S. - Perish all perpetual thoughts, be objective, calculate and reject it by physics and physics only. - Those questions should be answered by orders. Q1 would be the first one need to be answered. The CND1 is the key to Q1, and the imagination and creativity are the keys to CND1. - Sinerely, there are lots lots of creative optimise could be apply to this system. And the accumulate method will stand even when this wave energy had been rejected.

Tidal / Hydro Power: - This is a concept of a primitive prototype. - Which means all parts are upgradable too. - But it could be build and work already from the current design. - Sinerely, there are lots of creative aspetcs of further discussions could be found from this system.

HolyDamn20 · 2022-09-22T14:41:47+00:00

It had been 2 days since the last response. I posted this to several sites, I got lectured about "the descriptions is not precise", and the "super universal friction".

Since apply F once generates D1, say 1mm, how much would D1 be when we apply F twice or more times? And D2?

It's a pity that this is a question which is so easy to understand. Maybe friction is more effective or powerful than fluid, compression, tension, or counterforce in this case, maybe not.

It had been seen, will delete this post tomorrow unless we have real discussion closed to the topic.

HolyDamn20 · 2022-09-20T19:26:18+00:00

Now I am sure you didn't think it through. And I doubt you had ever read it through.

In this case, above all complicated complex effects, you insist friction. Please allow me to stop answering you until I see some calculations about friction and D1, D2.

HolyDamn20 · 2022-09-20T09:34:56+00:00

I believe you didn't read or think it through.

Please feel free to do other or further discussions.

HolyDamn20