If you want to be specific, the woman is "worthwhile" in the first 4 years of the child's life. Women have a biological cycle of 4 years after which they destroy their relationship. An ancient civilization Romans/Greeks(?) would separate the child from the mother at 4 years of age.

So what you're saying - if women do have any purpose in the child's life, - that would come before the age of 4. After that there is no purpose to have the woman in the child's life.

In the real world in college educated couples the woman initiates 90% of divorce and women earn 97% of alimony. Marriage is the transfer of money from the man to the woman. This is not in the child's benefit.

I linked you single mothers and you can see that women are not suitable parents. This is logical because women aren't adults. Women make up rules that make no sense and then selectively enforce them. This fast tracks the kid to drug use, prison, and drop out.

So what you're saying that a woman has any value, would happen before 4.

it's clear that in 2020 the best case scenario is the man developing that side of himself that you claim he "cant have because it's not in anybody's interest for a man to develop that side." It is, in 2020, in the man's interest to develop that side.

A man must not only develop his relentless savage persona but again his caring, nurturing side as well. Men make much better parents than women. You're talking about the "goo goo" nonsense speech that women do. A man can learn to do this. I'm teaching myself to be like this when I talk to animals. I know at some point I will be raising a child without the woman involved because it is better for the child.

As far as how "obscure" my claim is, it's the truth for America. If you're using a Japanese wife those women also often steal the kid and disappear. A child without the father is a waste of time. So for America and for Japan this is true. Women are unfit to be parents or wives.

I have no idea what country you're talking about - I have, at a time, studied "where I could have a wife." I finally decided that probably Chinese is the only way to have a wife. You'd have to use an Asian culture that is based on their family.

Remember that you have a significant bias to defend women regardless of facts. Especially if you are younger than 30. You don't yet understand how much women control you. So while you think you are presenting me facts, you probably aren't. Just being real with you. It is in your interest to pretend women have value because you're attracted to them when they're 23 years old like all men are.

The one country that I can possibly think of that has women who have some value would be Ukraine? You are from Ukraine?

Still not worth dealing with women though. I'd rather focus on the child (the actual child) not have to deal with the woman's antics.

When I was young and I'm leading kids in a summer camp I'm singing them lullabyes, being sweet to them, I can easily raise a child by myself (I'm male)

"white race would be ruined forever be careful what you wish for" is an emotional argument I have nothing to do with "saving white people," and to carry this sort of thing on your shoulders would only destroy your mental health

I haven't seen any valid reasons for why a woman would be worthwhile besides the standard "European guy making claims like men can't be parents, (untrue, men make better parents) - that's great that your country everybody is drinking and partying. That's obviously not a sustainable lifestyle.

My kitchen has proteins, herbs and spices, I have a gym in my room, I have no friends, I take care of people on the street, I take care of homeless,

This is an "old time" argument that men are not allowed to be parents - because why? - because the woman is a worthless animal, and it has to squeeze itself into the man's care somehow.

Now I understand that in Europe this is what happens. Women have all the education and careers, and men are bums.

So the man is still the parent while she works??

You won't provide any solid arguments for your case but I can easily provide solid arguments against it.

• Like I said women initiate 90% of divorce in college educated couples

• Women have a 4 year cycle after which they destroy the relationship (the only exception to this is when she was a virgin, so her pair bonding is still intact, enabling her to think she loves the man) So after those 4 years are over, the child must be given to the man to continue the parenting. This doesn't happen in any country. So you either pick do you want a "bad" first 4 years (probably not that bad) or a bad 5-75 years. A male parent will ensure that the child has a good life. A female parent cannot do this.

• Women are inferior to men in every possible way. Physically, mentally, in worth ethic, and in the responsibility they're willing to take. This is why women fool you from the moment you are born into thinking women are indispensable. They just killed you off in 2 world wars. You must be very confused to think a woman has more societal value than you. She does not.

• Your hormones confuses your mind. You want a woman but you aren't in a position to understand that by the time she is 25 she looks like a dumpster. You aren't yet old enough to understand that women are only attractive for 6% of their lifespan.

• As mentioned in the link single mothers create drug addicts, violent rapists, prison population, and since women are destroying the marriages then it guarantees your child has no future if you use a woman in place of a surrogate

I keep writing all this because I'm trying to latch onto something that isn't there. You provided no arguments for why women should be a part of the family, because there simply are none.

The laundry, dish washing, floor cleaning, this can all be done by robots.

The woman can work her meaningless career until she dies, she can go to clubs, she can get banged out on Tinder, and you can raise your child safely and happily on your own. You don't have to know how many miles of dick she is taking.