First US lunar lander in more than 50 years rockets toward moon with commercial deliveries
submitted 4 months ago by neolib from (apnews.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 4 months ago (1 child)
I absolutely have. A rocket engine, or air propulsion cannot work in a vacuum. There is zero resistance to push anything forward. It's so crazy. I've seen all of the videos of true vacuums built and propulsion inside that can't even move a flag. Everything NASA(US Defense Dept) tells you dies under the weight of its own details.
It just baffles me how Mr. Pettit stands on a stage to this day and claims they can't solve the "Tyranny of the Rocket Equation", which is how to carry enough fuel for their payloads, and that we can't leave "low earth orbit", and yet here we are going to the moon again. It's astounding.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
"Tyranny of the Rocket Equation", which is how to carry enough fuel for their payloads, and that we can't leave "low earth orbit", and yet here we are going to the moon again. It's astounding.
This.
And they're completely omitting the zero propulsion in space detail.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
space
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)