you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Well, in the end it all depends on what you want to believe.

People have landed in prison for evidence that's much more flimsy. US juries could easily be convinced, I'm sure.

Others can't believe that the Bush Admin would ever be involved in 9/11. Building 7, or not.

I don't have an professional quality dental evidence, or forensic facial recognition. It sounds like you need 12 sigma confidence, and that never happens in the conspiracy realm.

Instead, how about an interesting one about the Paul McCartney's?

The one on the right is supposedly Billy Shears Campbell.
He's probably an impostor. Wonder what his parents thought.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, in the end it all depends on what you want to believe.

That's kinda depressing. I'm hopeful that objective facts can lead to a high probability of something being true or false.

In court they would at least have a trained forensic person give an opinion, which is a bit more trustworthy than untrained folks.

I don't want 6 Sigma, I just want a little more, something beyond a painted graphics overlay which may not even be measuring anything. Like show software analysing the two faces. And there are volunteer forensicists that help conspiracy people sometimes.

I don't buy this Paul thing at all, it has even weaker evidence than Jones being Hicks.

Anyway happy Friday man.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In court they would at least have a trained forensic person give an opinion, which is a bit more trustworthy than untrained folks.

Not true. In many states coroner's don't have to even be doctors. In some they're elected. "Vote for me, cause I know what a murder looks like!".

Plenty of people in prisob are 100% innocent. In the land of the free.

Concerning Paul...

George Harrison confirmed it, then someone broke into his house, and almost killed him.

John was murdered by a manturian candidate..

Ringo also confirmed it recently, as well..

Ringo Starr claims that he finally decided to tell the truth because he was afraid that it was going to die with him. At age 74, he is the only other surviving member of the famous band besides Paul McCartney, and he was afraid the deception would never be revealed.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There’s just one problem, the Hollywood Inquirer isn’t actually a website and doesn’t even exist. In fact, the entire discussion with the legendary drummer was completely fabricated.

https://www.inquisitr.com/1890679/no-ringo-starr-didnt-just-confirm-paul-mccartney-died-in-1966/

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

James Corbett would say, "Don't you believe your lying eyes!".

Is it the eye that is lying? Is it the minds-eye, that refuses to see the subtle but distinct differences?

IDK...? ;-)